Grantmaking over the past thirty years has changed dramatically. From the early days of small trusts and foundations supporting local organisations to today where giant multilaterals like the World Bank making strategic investments in every corner of the world. The rise of corporate foundations as the new dominant force continues to keep the sector in flux.
As grant funding reaches a new stage of maturity and professionalism, increasingly funding organisations are demanding a greater return on investment from grantees. This philosophy partly stems from the injection of massive corporations into the grant making scene, organisations who are built around returns and profits rather than development outcomes. The worldwide recession has also heaped significant pressure on multilateral and bilateral donors to reduce costs, waste and to demonstrate the impact they are making with their considerable budgets.
(Ad) Still, finding it difficult to find new grants and donors to support your work? No way to easily search and identify upcoming funding opportunities? No idea how to raise funds? We have a solution for you. Our Premium Membership service answers all your questions. Learn more.
These changes have seen a new sphere of grant making start to emerge, that of Outcome funding. Outcome funding takes a different approach to typical grant making where investments are made on the basis of delivering interventions such as training schemes or facilities. Instead outcome funding provides investments only when positive social outcomes are confirmed.
Outcome funding is sometimes referred to as part of the “Investor Approach” which is itself a relatively new aspect of developmental funding. The Investor Approach is defined as ‘investing for results rather than allocating funds’. This approach often includes support to community organisations in the per and post application stages to ensure that they have sufficient knowledge and organisational capacity to deliver the proposed project. The W.K. Kellogg Foundation is perhaps the worlds biggest charitable foundation that prioritises outcome funding saying “If you don’t know where you’re going, how are you gonna know when you get there?’
(Ad) Too many advertisements on this website? Get an ad-free and fully optimized website experience to find grants and donors of your interest. Premium Membership service offers a clean and user-friendly interface for you to raise funds successfully! Learn more.
The primary focus of this approach is results. These are determined ahead of time by the grantmaker who will clearly state the exact results they aim to achieve with the money allocated. Organisations seeking grants will then have an opportunity to work with the foundation to create a sustainable project that can hit the proposed targets.
The advantage of this type of funding for grantmakers is that they can motivate organisations to be more results focused and they do not risk any of their investment unless it achieves the desired results. For the grantee, this approach can often be seem to be far more troublesome. The nature of this type of funding requires that organisations are able to invest their own resources to launch the project and maintain it until the time when results can be delivered. This capacity is rare which often rules out all but the biggest and most secure international development organisations.
(Ad) Premium Membership offers unlimited search options to find your grants and donors. Search by country or thematic area of your work interest or even by keyword. View the number of open grants for your country. on a Google Map. Keep a watch on grant deadlines through a calendar. Learn more.
The intention of outcome funding is positive with a real focus on achieving results which change lives rather than simply providing the means for an organisation to do so. There is increased attention to the real life, tangible difference investments have made over a more general number of people supported type measurement. Outcome funding asks how many people have we found a job for rather than how many people have we trained.
The final factor for grantmakers adopting the outcome approach is more of a cut throat, capitalist question, which may upset some working in extremely traumatic and difficult situations…Was it value for money? Did the funder get the return on investment they had aimed for? To some extent it seems like a more cold and calculating approach but simultaneously it demands a focus on real,actionable help and positive increases in the quality of life.
(Ad) Too many emails about grants, but too few leads? Join Premium and use our Specific Email Alerts feature where you can select your country/countries and thematic areas of work interest and receive grant information accordingly. Learn more.
As the world continues to turn and grantmakers continue to adapt and revise their approaches it will be interesting to see how much of an impact outcome funding will have on the sector as a whole.
Have you heard of outcome funding before? Could it work for your organisation? Let us know what you think in the comments.
(Ad) Our Premium Donor Search feature works like a mini-search engine. As soon as you define the search criteria and click on search, it scans the internet for the best possible matches of donor agencies based according to your interest and presents a list that you need. Learn more.
- FundsforNGOs collection of the best non-profit Associations
- NGO Management: Using Consultants in your Organisation
- Fundraising Essentials: Grant Fundraising Strategy Checklist
- Fundraising Essentials: Grant Exit Strategies
- Fundraising Essentials: How to thank donors
- NGO Management: How to assemble a Board of Trustees
- Grant Proposals: What to do if your proposal is rejected